Radiometric dating according to creationists Dating sight hotestvideos
He stated: So here’s another evolutionist who refused to accept the results given from radiometric dating.
Why is there so little confidence in the outcome of radiometric dating that scientist admit that they regularly reject data provided by that means?
According to the bible and according to History Jesus was 33 and a half years old when he was crucified on the cross at Calvary. As he was there before the foundation of the earth.
Christians can be divided into two groups when it comes to this.
So aircraft designers and pilots can predict, given a certain set of circumstances precisely how much runway a plane will need to take off , and land; how much fuel will be burned, etc. Given the same conditions, the aircraft doesn’t need 2,000 feet of runway to take off one day, and 500 feet to take off the next day, and 3,000 feet another day.
The evidence many find persuasive: radiometric dating.So if you in fact weigh 175 lbs, you would not expect one method to give you 50 lbs, another to give 250 and yet another to give you 388 lbs.If that is the case, it is indicative of a serious problem with the techniques you are using to get the weight.As a licensed pilot and certified flight instructor, I’ve bet my life, and the life of my students and passengers that I know exactly how a given plane will perform under given circumstances: how much runway it will take to take off, fly a specified distance and land at another airport. What inputs it takes to recover from a stall (that’s not a reference to the engine by the way) and spins. Anyone who has flown in a plane is betting the science of flight is a “hard science” with consistent predictable results.On the other hand, would I bet my life on the supposed age of a rock, or fossil based on radiometric dating and the testimony of some Ph D scientists?
Search for radiometric dating according to creationists:
All you need to do is compare the methodology of radiometric dating with that of predicting aircraft performance and the answer becomes perfectly obvious.